Monday, August 10, 2009

《誰殺了我們的孩子》

夏日HKIFF節目中我看的第一部片,是四川地震紀錄片《誰殺了我們的孩子》,導演潘劍林趕在新聞封鎖前到了四川災區青川縣的木魚鎮,集中訪問鎮上在地震倒塌的中學的相關人士,讓觀眾決定一系列問題的答案:是豆腐渣危房?學校宿舍大門關上學生逃不出來?官方是否低報死亡數字?救援是否延誤?

官說官話,也有三個層次。基層學校領導,老實人不懂說謊,啞口無言;市教育局領導,口聲聲「以人為本」,欲言又只;救援指揮領導官最高,道行最高,一句「沒理由隱瞞」,兩句什麼都是為你好,面皮極厚。然而,堅稱只有二百幾人死亡,其他人去了哪裡?連死者名單也不肯拿出來對一對,「現在還不方便」。最絕一招,用衛生理由把死者墳墓草草掩蓋,毀滅死亡人數最後證據,家長哭訴不人道,官說不能預先諮詢,因為諮詢了就辦不成了,吓,這是「以人為本」?

老師中有些比較敢言,提出證據早就向政府上書表明校舍是危房。學生是最冷靜的,講的最可信。但令人意外的是救災的武警的坦率之言,其中一位更直說:救災工作發揮了偉大中華民族精神,但也顯示很多不足,如果不能從中學習,中華民族不配被稱為偉大。官只有興趣搞的,是帶中央台進臨時校舍拍學生唱國歌,但當家長衝進來抗議,電視攝影隊雞咁腳走,學生才流下淚來,他們心中是知道發生什麼事的。最後訪問一位志願者說得坦白,危房全國皆是,是普遍問題,答案必定是政治、社會改革。

留在我腦海中的,是孩子唱的國歌歌詞:「起來! 不願做奴隸的人們!」起來吧,孩子們,國家是屬於你們的,不要做這「國家」的奴隸!

2 Comments:

At 9:11 AM, Blogger Henry Chan said...

Hi, all,

I think that Mainland China has good regulations but they lack the processes and procedures to monitor. This is because they do not allow different voices from the other political parties and the voices from internet/blog/wiki to comment their methods to implement the regulations.

I remembered that an author mentioned "The truth would become more clear if we could argue about the truth. The fault would become more true if we could argue about the fault." Hope that we could learn from his statements.

God bless HK.

Henry Kar Ming Chan

 
At 7:36 AM, Blogger Henry Chan said...

Hi, all,

I just want to say a few more words about this issue. The arguments between different political parties may provide better contribution and effective policies rather than good monitoring and efficiency policies.

USA president Obama also invited other political parties to be the federal government officers. Hope that Mainland China can know the benefits of different political parties in the government offices.

God bless China.

Henry Kar Ming Chan

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

-->