Wednesday, June 25, 2014

就《六四事件》動議辯論的發言

主席,今天六四廿五周年已經個了三個星期,但無減我們對這個辯論的重視。昨晚我在美國的香港人朋友Dennis,他知道今天我們做六四辯論,他特別在電郵對我說:

「六四過了廿五年,但近來越來越多指鹿為馬,顛倒黑白是非的官員亂講(包括中央和香港),所以更有必要重提六四,讓後生的知道真相。」

他說:「我有個香港同事,一向無乜點關心六四,今年問我借件六四T恤,佢話公司越來越多強國人,大部份80、9O後,唔知到真相,所以他要將件T恤同當年文匯報六四報導貼响他的辦公室門口,等啲後生仔經過見到。」

我朋友問佢做乜今年咁激,他話就是因為聽到乜周融愛港力之流話六四真相,條氣吾順,所以要貼。

本來,大家廿五年前在電視機上所見所知的,從在現場第一手的人所知所見的,本來都很清楚,但有些人可能見到六四屠殺已過了廿五年,以為有些人記憶開始模糊,年輕的更容易被影響,顛倒是非。

六四真相究竟是什麼?我手上的"The Tiananmen Papers",中文翻譯本正正叫做《中國「六四」真相》,兩位著名的海外中國學者Andrew Nathan和Perry Link,搜集了過千份中國政府文件,在2001年出版。這些文件是什麼?包括政治局、國務院至各地區、軍區的報告和會議紀錄。

那些自稱六四真相的人,我不知道他們憑什麼說真相,但他們講的不外乎廣場無死人,又稱當日解放軍根本沒有「亂槍掃射」等等。我們且看廿五年前的6月19-21日的中央政治局擴大會議上,北京市委書記李錫銘的報告就死傷人數是這樣說的,以下我用英文讀出:

“Beijing Municipality has checked and double-checked all the figures from Martial Law Command, the Public Security Ministry, the Chinese Red Cross, all institutions of higher education, and all major hospitals. These show that 241 people died. They included twenty-three officers and soldiers from the martial law troops and 218 civilians.”

The book goes on to explain, that Li Ximing’s figures “should be viewed together with other reports about death of soldiers, citizens and students. Materials from the Martial Law Headquarters, for example, show that no member of the troops that advanced on the city the night of June 3 was killed by city residents, and no solider from the Thirty-Eighth Army, which was responsible for clearing the Square, died on June 3. Of the ten PLA soldiers who lost their lives…six were from the Thirty-Eighth Army, but these men dies when their military transport truck overturned about 2 am…. [These] cannot be properly described as “murdered by rioters.”

“A report from the Beijing Public Security Bureau said, ‘Those killed included university professors, technical people, officials, workers, owners of small public businesses, retired workers, high school students, and grade school students, of whom the youngest was nine years old.’ To judge from this distribution of ages and occupations – from retired old ladies to a nine-year-old child – it would seem likely that the great majority of these people were innocent of all crime.

李錫銘是誰?趙紫陽在回憶錄《改革歷程》中說:「(1989年4月)24日的常委會上把學潮定性為『有組織、有計劃、有預謀的反黨反社會主義的政治鬥爭』,並形成了會議紀要。李鵬、李錫銘、陳希同是始作俑者。」

根據這些資料,薄一波的女婿,他已經貴為人大的法律委員會副主席,都在木樨地政府大樓被殺,就是因為他著了燈在窗門睇街,結果不單喪命,還被納入為暴徒那條總數。

這些就是六四真相,是國家機器有預謀地暴力屠殺無辜的平民。所以,我另一位朋友Norman托我問建制派的議員,如果你的家人都在六四成為受難者,你會不會仍然今天投反對或棄權票?

所以,六四是反映我們中國人良心最好的一面鏡。主席,我謹此陳詞,支持六四動議,大家一會再看清楚議員怎樣投票。

1 Comments:

At 6:19 PM, Anonymous Moon Skin said...

This is awesomme

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

-->